Exploring The Extent of Thomson’s Violinist Analogy
Questioning the Thomson’s Violinist Analogy
But in this Hedonist version of the violinist analogy, does the violinist have the right to use your body? No, he does not. You are responsible for the violinist’s existence, but you are not responsible for his neediness, given that he exist. You’re not responsible for his neediness because there was no way you could have engaged in the pleasurable activity without causing the violinist to exist at this time. But if that’s right, then this same line of reasoning applies to a pregnancy that is the result of voluntary sex. She is responsible for the existence of the fetus, but is not responsible for the neediness of the fetus, given that it exists.
Analysis of the Judith Thomson’s violinist analogy
Judith Thomsons, who is the abortion defender, argues that in some cases abortion is morally justifiable especially when it comes to rape cases. However, she does not support abortion or agree that it is always permissible. Thomsons believes that in case the woman has been raped and impregnated, it is justifiable to terminate the pregnancy if only that pregnancy threatens the mother’s life. In order to help people understand the ethical dilemmas behind abortion, Thomsons employs diverse stories especially the violinist analogy in order to provide a clear justification of abortion for rape cases. Following the violinist analogy of Thomson in proving that abortion is right, I agree that her argument for abortion on rape cases would work.
3. What conclusion regarding the rights of the fetus, the rightsof the mother, and the moral permissibility of abortion does Thomson drawbased on the violinist analogy?The violinist analogy suggests that a mother has no more responsibility for the welfare of her child than she has to a total stranger. McDonagh's view is even worse. She argues the child is not merely a stranger, but a violent assailant the mother needs to ward off in self-defense.