Is censorship ever justifiable?

I don't think that censorship is justified. Ideas don't can threaten a nation but often bring about much needed changes to the country. Government or society shouldn't be able to dictate what is available to the public for the reason that it isn't the government's job to protect our minds from what we might see or hear. That is a parent's job and usually we encounter something that they tried to protect us from later in life anyways. Books can be weapons against the status quo that needs to be changed. What is offensive and what is not offensive is a matter of opinion and perspective, so the word offensive itself isn't specific to any certain material. No one person can define the word offensive for all people because it is never the same. All material should be available to the public because what's offensive is a matter of opinion and the government shouldn't be able to limit what our minds can access. Hope this helps :)


Is Censorship Sometimes Justified Free Essays - StudyMode

When Is Government Web Censorship Justified

One of the issues raised is whether the protesters’ calls to cancel performances of the opera amount to censorship. If so, is such censorship justified?

Is Censorship Ever Justified? | Teen Politics Essay | Teen Ink

The empirical evidence remains the subject of ongoing debate andinvestigation. But in the absence of sufficiently conclusive evidencethat pornography causes crimes of sexual violence, many liberaldefenders of pornography continue to view censorship asunjustified.

Is censorship ever justified?
The definition of the word weapon is: a device designed to injure or kill, something used to gain an advantage. Books are to be used to educate and education is knowledge and knowledge is power. The Nazi’s didn’t want the people to have knowledge or power, if the people had power that meant that they wouldn’t. In regards to whether or not offensive material should be burned or banned, firstly, what the Nazi’s burned was not offensive material it was merely information which they were trying to prevent the people from knowing. If it were truly offensive material it would most likely be better to burn, completely erase, the material. However, by banning material you are allowing the possible return of the material, perhaps at a different time the material will be less offensive. There is no right or wrong answer to that question. It is merely a matter of opinion. In my opinion, yes, books are weapons, probably one of the most lethal weapons out there and no matter the circumstance I believe that it is out of societies and/or the government’s power to ban or burn anything that belongs to the public. So is censorship ever justified? No, because everyone has the right to know, to learn, to think. There is yet a third major argument forcensorship that Plato himself did not suggest, but is nonetheless as prevalenttoday as his two arguments above. It is that censorship is justified because itprotects us from . Flag burning offends, and so too do hatespeech, pornography, and desecration of religious symbols, and for that reasonthese expressions should be suppressed. Even if they don’t morally corruptchildren or put our society at risk, the fact that they cause offense in and ofitself is a justification for their censorship. On the surface, this argumentfor censorship has an appeal: there are things that offend each one of us andwe would prefer that those things never surface to begin with. There is a majorproblem with this argument, though. We can’t simply apply a simple formula like“if an idea offends, then its censorship is justifiable”: there are varyingdegrees of offense, and different people find different things offensive. It’snot reasonable to censor an idea merely on the grounds that it offends a selectgroup of religious leaders, for example. We need some standard by which todistinguish those differences if the notion of offense can play any meaningfulrole at all in the free speech and censorship debate. American philosopher JoelFeinberg (1926-2004) offered such a test for identifying offensive expressionsthat might be worthy of censorship, and there are four relevant conditions tothat test. Whether censorship is justified is always a controversial issue that attracts great public attention, and views of different people might vary greatly. As far as I am concerned, I tend to think that the censorship in China is somehow justified otherwise how can China developed so rapidly for the recent years.

Is Censorship ever Justified? by Michael Chong on Prezi

In this media-intensive age, where we are bombarded with magazines, newspapers, periodicals, television and radio programmes, advertisements, and what-not, the issue of censorship inevitably comes into play. Censorship, has been practiced by governments and the press since the beginning of time. Yet, is censorship ever justified? Can it ever be justified?

How does one measure the degree to which content is ‘inappropriate’ or ‘harmful’? Are there cases where media censorship is justifiable?


Yes, censorship is justified sometimes in the name of decency. When I drive my children to church, I don't want them to have to pass naked people protesting on the street. This is a valuable use of censorship. It is okay for the government to limit the time or location of free speech, as long as it is allowed freely in some circumstances.

In India, is web censorship justified in the name of national security

Is web censorship ever justified

One of the issues raised is whether the protesters’ calls to cancel performances of the opera amount to censorship. If so, is such censorship justified?